Not only does storytelling have an intuitive appeal, but it also elicits
hormones that make us feel emotions.
Hormones such as dopamine, oxytocin, and endorphins generate feelings of empathy, trust, creativity, and increased focus. Climate change communication, therefore, needs to create a
chemical concoction of empowering hormones resulting in a captivated audience that feels inspired to act in more positive ways! Recently there has been a push for scientists to focus on
framing their facts so that they tell a more compelling story. Instead of bombarding people with evidence, scientists need to focus on how they present them. Done very effectively in examples like
Braiding Sweetgrass by scientist
Robin Wall Kimmerer, the blend of storytelling and science has resulted in complex ecosystems becoming understandable by more and more people. After several studies,
Boris et al. realised that narratives structured as stories resulted in
experiential processing, heightened engagement and emotional arousal - which catalyzes action. Their studies showed that when information is embedded in the structure of a story, cardiac activity was influenced, and subsequently, pro-environmental behaviour. Furthermore, when biologist Andrew Thaler
talks about climate change, he doesn't talk about science. Rather, he tells stories that are important to his audiences - such as those involving fishing, farming, faith, and the future. In a nonsensical world with so many polarising opinions and a general lack of cohesiveness,
storytelling makes sense of the world but more importantly, it makes connections and makes us feel human.